David Grusch
A former U.S. intelligence officer who alleged that information about secret UFO retrieval programs had been withheld from Congress. His 2023 disclosures and testimony became a major event in the modern debate over UAP and government oversight.
- KNOWN FOR
- Crash-retrieval allegations · The 2023 congressional UAP hearing
Published Updated
His role in the intelligence community
Grusch’s prepared congressional statement describes fourteen years in intelligence, including Air Force service and civilian work at the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. He also served in a National Reconnaissance Office reservist capacity and worked with the UAP Task Force. His stated assignment included identifying special-access programs relevant to that task force’s mission. That professional setting matters because his public account concerns information he says he encountered while investigating government activities, rather than a personal sighting of an object in the sky.
The allegations that became public
Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal introduced Grusch’s account in The Debrief in June 2023. He alleged that government and contractor programs possessed recovered craft of non-human origin, and that information had been improperly withheld from lawmakers. The article included supportive statements from other sources. It also described classified material that readers could not inspect. The distinction is important: the report documented named people making extraordinary claims, while the alleged hardware and much of the asserted supporting evidence remained outside the public record.
Sources: Intelligence officials say U.S. has retrieved craft of non-human origin
What his testimony was based on
At the July 26, 2023 hearing, Grusch appeared alongside Ryan Graves and David Fravor. In his written statement, he explicitly based his account on information supplied by other people, including photographs, documents, and classified testimony he said they had shared. He described being told about a longstanding retrieval and reverse-engineering effort to which he was denied access. This differs from Fravor’s description of a visual encounter. The three witnesses should be read individually, with each claim connected to the person and kind of knowledge behind it.
Sources: David Grusch’s opening and closing statementsThe July 26, 2023 UAP hearing
The scope of the whistleblower complaint
A June 2023 statement from his former attorneys at Compass Rose clarified that their representation concerned alleged withholding of information from Congress and associated personnel matters. The firm said it took no position on the contents of the information Grusch later characterized publicly. Its description of an “urgent and credible” finding related to the withholding allegation. Treating that phrase as official confirmation of recovered non-human craft would go beyond what the attorneys’ statement says.
Sources: Compass Rose’s statement on the scope of its representation
Back on Rogan in 2026
On September 30, 2026, Grusch returned to The Joe Rogan Experience for episode #2560, a two-and-a-half-hour conversation he said he hoped would be his last interview for a while. He told Rogan he had been “living a nightmare.” By his account, he lay low through 2024 after the UAP Disclosure Act failed, then spent about a year and a half as a professional staff member for Representative Eric Burlison, which he believed made him the first congressional whistleblower to be hired by Congress afterward. He said he left around Labor Day 2026. He described that work as letters, classified briefings for members and legal interrogatories, including one sent that summer to the MITRE Corporation. He also credited the office with winning the release of a formerly classified 1952 MIT Lincoln Laboratory recording in which, he said, Project Blue Book’s Edward Ruppelt briefs scientists about unexplained objects near nuclear sites and test ranges, some clocked at an estimated 3,500 miles an hour around White Sands and Holloman.
An origin story without a sighting
Grusch insisted he has never had a personal encounter. An amateur astronomer since about age twelve, with a physics degree, he said he grew up on The X-Files and Star Trek: The Next Generation and, like many new intelligence officers, typed “Area 51” into a classified database and found nothing. The strangeness arrived sideways. Around 2009, he said, he read the Defense Intelligence Reference Documents and wondered why the DIA cared about magnetohydrodynamic propulsion and cloaking. Imagery analysts later told him they had been asked to airbrush something round out of photographs. He described a year-long, “smoking man” style courtship for unusual accesses that never materialized, and a spring 2017 moment at the CIA when the chief of a sensitive office pulled him aside to ask what he knew about UFOs. He joined the UAP Task Force effort as the NRO’s representative in early 2019, and said he later learned that a top-secret program he had worked on had been searching for UAP without his knowledge.
The threats he says he survived
The darkest part of the interview concerned what Grusch said happened after October 2020, when he was, in his words, “administratively nuked.” He said his NRO boss was walked out of headquarters in Chantilly, Virginia, colleagues were targeted, and he was investigated by three agencies. In early 2021, he said, people helping him began reporting symptoms of anomalous health incidents, which he thought most likely came from microwave directed energy. In early 2022 he received a message, coordinated with messages to others the same day, that he and his wife could be reached. Weeks later, in Washington for a UAP conference, he said he was summoned to an off-books meeting in the Senate Intelligence Committee’s secure vault, where a dozen or more senior staffers heard that two named individuals had wanted to kill him; one shaken staffer, he said, fetched whiskey for the room. He said the plan had been stopped. Grusch also told Rogan that while following the money he found a criminal enterprise operating under cover of national security programs at one agency, including child trafficking, which he reported to the Justice Department; he said that investigation is ongoing and declined to give details. He named an Air Force friend, Matthew Sullivan, as one of his sources and said Sullivan died about two years earlier in circumstances still under investigation. He also said he resigned his Air Force commission under duress and has petitioned to be allowed to retire.
The footage of the dead crew
Grusch’s most striking claim was that he had watched video of a crash retrieval. He would not date it beyond calling it contemporary and clear, nothing like grainy 1950s film, and said he spent years checking it through other sources before trusting that it was not a deception. As the camera panned across the site, it showed three or four dead occupants. He described them as human-looking and “very beautiful,” with pale, bluish-white skin, long grayish hair and some kind of form-fitting garment; he could not tell their sex. He associated beings like them with boomerang and crescent-shaped craft, and with a remark that retired Major General William Neil McCasland reportedly made to Tom DeLonge years earlier: think of the Greek gods. Grusch said McCasland walked out of his Albuquerque home and vanished within a week of what Grusch described as Trump’s February 2026 order to declassify UAP records. The bodies, he said, are preserved for analysis, and genomes were compared, though he never saw the biological reports and called that his biggest regret. Asked whether such beings might be engineered or a breakaway branch of humanity, he said he had the same questions.
Grays, reptilians and a war in the sky
Other beings reached Grusch secondhand, from colleagues he said had been present at retrievals and had seen some of them alive. He described grays in three or four subtypes, tall and small, with the small ones possibly androids and the tall ones apparently in charge, and pointed to the 1994 Ariel School sighting in Zimbabwe as a familiar match. Then came the reptilians: seven feet or taller, with what a friend described as a gorilla-like look and scaly skin, some more humanoid than others, and usually associated with tic-tac-shaped craft. Grusch said one tic-tac found wedged into the ground yielded dead grays alongside living reptilians, a case of the conflict between non-human intelligences that he said intelligence collection has documented, and he estimated at least a dozen or two such adversarial crashes. In that incident, he said, the reptilians posed a threat, U.S. personnel were hurt and killed, and the beings were shot. He added that some craft were recovered perfectly landed rather than wrecked, the phenomenon Rogan called “donations,” and that retrieval teams sometimes felt a wave of calm that he speculated might be a psychic countermeasure. Of insectoid beings he had heard only water-cooler talk. He was aware of how it all sounded: “I cannot believe I’m talking about this on Joe Rogan.”
Bases beneath the sea and a secret history
Grusch sketched a wider hidden geography. Colleagues from the undersea world, he said, joke that the 1989 film The Abyss is “kind of a docudrama”; he described a large structure, on the scale of several city blocks, at an undisclosed ocean location where objects come and go and whose origin is unknown. He cited the 1971 U.S.–Soviet Accidents Measures Agreement, whose Article 3 covers unidentified objects detected by missile warning systems, as a superpower hotline arrangement for UAP. He said a November 2004 disclosure exercise at a federally funded research center in Northern Virginia, which Rogan linked to Hal Puthoff and Grusch linked to national security adviser Stephen Hadley, who he said denies it, concluded that the biggest obstacle was legal exposure from decades of sole-source contracts rather than public panic. Other claims came in quick succession: an assessment for Richard Nixon warning of chaos shortly before Watergate, a planned audiovisual announcement under George H. W. Bush, Dick Cheney as the program’s longtime “mob boss,” and a pre-2016 effort, with Tom DeLonge as its public face, to prepare the ground for disclosure under a Hillary Clinton presidency. For the Blue Book years he pointed to a 1971 Australian Joint Intelligence Organisation paper by Harry Turner that describes the Air Force project as a facade.
What he says comes next
Grusch predicted that a threshold acknowledgement, that we are not alone and have recovered craft, will come before Donald Trump leaves office, ideally at least six months before the 2028 election so that a successor cannot reverse it. He praised Trump and Stephen Miller, suggested a rollout over roughly a year, and favored amnesty for program insiders modeled on South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, though not for the criminal conduct he alleged. He warned that artificial superintelligence sifting medical records and sensor data might expose the secret before the government does. Rogan also raised a claim circulating online, which he first attributed to Matthew Brown and then allowed may have come from others, that Grusch had planted a briefing Brown says he found on a classified system, effectively tricking him into becoming a whistleblower. Grusch said he first spoke with Brown around 2024, had never seen that briefing and had never made a hoax brief on the subject. Throughout, he stressed that he never had full access, that much of what he described came from others, and that the public should press for the evidence itself rather than take his word for it.
The unresolved public evidence
The Defense Department’s March 2024 summary of AARO’s historical review reported no verifiable evidence that government or private industry had accessed extraterrestrial technology. That institutional finding is an essential counterpoint to retrieval allegations, while the report’s remit and reasoning remain open to scrutiny. Grusch’s influence is already visible in public attention to oversight and protected reporting. Establishing the physical claims would require evidence that can be independently examined; a hearing, a complaint, and an official denial are different records with different things to tell us.
Sources: DOD report discounts sightings of extraterrestrial technologyThe July 26, 2023 UAP hearingCompass Rose’s statement on the scope of its representation
Sources & further reading
David Grusch’s opening and closing statementsU.S. House of Representatives · July 26, 2023 · PDFIntelligence officials say U.S. has retrieved craft of non-human originLeslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal · The Debrief · June 5, 2023Compass Rose’s statement on the scope of its representationThe Debrief · Reproduces the law firm’s June 9, 2023 statementThe July 26, 2023 UAP hearingU.S. House Oversight Committee · Hearing recordDOD report discounts sightings of extraterrestrial technologyU.S. Department of Defense · March 8, 2024Joe Rogan Experience #2560 – David GruschPowerfulJRE · YouTube · September 30, 2026 · Grusch’s own unverified claimsUFO whistleblower David Grusch: ‘We are not alone’ | Official Ross Coulthart NewsNation interviewNewsNation · Grusch’s first television interview, aired June 11, 2023 · Uploaded to YouTube April 2, 2025If You Still Think UFOs Are Fake, Watch This (David Grusch Interview)Jesse Michels · American Alchemy · YouTube · September 10, 2023Hearing on Unidentified Anomalous PhenomenaC-SPAN · July 26, 2023 · Full video of the House Oversight subcommittee hearingDiscuss this person
Compare notes with other readers: witness details, sources, and the parts that still do not add up.
Open the discussion